User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.3; xx; KFTT Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Silk/3.41 like Chrome/37.0.2026.117 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/tablet/os-fireos.yaml
Silk 3.41FireOS 2Blink 537.36AmazonKindle Fire HDtabletyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Silk 3.41Blink Android 4.0AmazonKindle Fire HD 7Tabletyesyes0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Silk 3.41closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 37.0.2026.117closeAndroid 4.0.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.255 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 37.0Blink Android 4.0AmazonKindle Fire HDtabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 37.0.2026.117closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Amazon Silk 3.41closeAndroid 4.0.3AmazonKindle Fire HD 7"closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.108 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Silk 3.41WebKit 537.36Fire OS AmazonKindle Fire HD 7"closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.489 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Silk 3.41Blink FireOS 2AmazonKindle Fire HDtabletyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 37.0.2026.117closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 37closeAndroid 4.0AmazonKFTTTabletyesyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:04 | by ThaDafinser