User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090725 Moblin/3.5.1-2.5.14.moblin2 Shiretoko/3.5.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-525.php
Firefox 3.5Linux unknown1.9.1 unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.5Gecko 1.9.1Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.06201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox (Shiretoko) 3.5.1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.275 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox Shiretoko (3.5Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Shiretoko 3.5.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox (Shiretoko) 3.5.1closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.019 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Shiretoko 3.5.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Shiretoko 3.5.1Gecko 20090725Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose3.553 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox Shiretoko 3.5.1Gecko 1.9.1Linux desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:03 | by ThaDafinser