User agent detail

LG-CU920/V1.0s Obigo/Q05A Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Nokia6233/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia6233 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 5.0 JAVA LGCU920Mobile Phoneyes0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-CU920 V1.0scloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM mobile-browseryescloseclose0.258 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo Q05A Symbian Nokia6233smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 2.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 5close Nokia6233closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Q05A Browser Q05A NokiaOS NokiaNokia 6233closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 5A Series40 Nokia6233mobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo Q05Aclose Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:02 | by ThaDafinser