User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (X11; FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT i386; U; en) Presto/2.9.168 Version/11.50
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
FreeBSD 9.0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 11.50Presto 2.9FreeBSD Desktop0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 11.50closeBSD 9.0-CURRENTdesktop-browsercloseclose0.182 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 11.50Presto FreeBSD 9.0desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.50closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 11.50closeFreeBSD 9.0closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 11.50closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.056 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 11.50Presto 2.9.168FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 11.50Presto 2.9.168FreeBSD 9.0desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux zvav Desktopcloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:02 | by ThaDafinser