User agent detail

LG-G4050 UP.Browser/6.2.2 (GUI) MMP/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGG4050 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA LGG4050Mobile Phoneyes0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-G4050 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.2close LGG4050mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 LGG4050smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.2.2close LGG4050closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.2 LGLGG4050closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.413 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2 LGG4050mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close LGG4050Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.035 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:02 | by ThaDafinser