User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; zh-CN; R831K Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/10.3.1.549 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-2.yml
UC Browser 10.3.1.549Android 4.2.2WebKit OPPONeo 3smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 10.3U3 Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2OPPOR831Kmobile-browseryescloseclose0.248 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 10.3WebKit Android 4.2OPPONeo 3smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 10.3.1closeAndroid 4.2.2R831Kcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.065 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 10.3.1.549WebKit 534.30Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.424 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 10.3Webkit 534.30Android 4.2.2OppoReal 20 R831Kmobile:smartyescloseclose0.025 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 10closeAndroid 4.2OPPOR831KSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:02 | by ThaDafinser