User agent detail

LG-GW520-H3G/V10g Teleca/WAP2.0 MIDP-2.1/CLDC-1.1 UNTRUSTED/1.0 UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; en-US; LG-GW520-H3G) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.3.0.326 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGGW520-H3G Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-GW520-H3G V10gcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.3 LGGW520smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.3.0close LGGW520-H3Gcloseclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Teleca-Obigo close closecloseclosecloseclose0.077 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.3.0.326 LGLGGW520closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.419 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo WAP 2.0Gecko LGGW520mobile:featureyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UCBrowser Java Applet 9close LGGW520Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:02 | by ThaDafinser