User agent detail

FAST-WebCrawler/2.2.11 (crawler@fast.no; http://www.fast.no/faq/faqfastwebsearch/faqfastwebcrawler.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
FAST-WebCrawler 2.2.11 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFAST-WebCrawlerBot/Crawler0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
FAST-WebCrawler 2.2.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesFAST Web Crawlerclose0.193 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesFAST-WebCrawlerclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesFAST-WebCrawlerCrawler0.118 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesFAST Web Crawlerclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:01 | by ThaDafinser