User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Windows; U; wds 7.10; zh-CN; NOKIA; Nokia 610C) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/3.0.1.302 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia610C Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 3.0U2 WinPhone7 7.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeWindows mobile-browseryescloseclose0.194 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 3.0 Windows NokiaNokia 610Csmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 1.0.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 3.0.1closeWindows Phone 7.10Nokia610Ccloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.119 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 3.0.1.302 Windows Nokiacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 3.0Gecko Windows Phone 7.5NokiaLumia 610mobile:smartyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:01 | by ThaDafinser