User agent detail

SAMSUNG-E1100C_CMCC/1.0 RTK-E/1.0 DF/1.0 Release/17.08.2007 Browser/OpenWave6.2.3.3.c.1.101/*MzU0NTYyMDM2MDg4NjY1 UP.Browser/6.2.3.3.c.1.101 (GUI) MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungE1100C Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.05401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-E1100C closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.3.c.1.101close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.191 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 SamsungE1100C CMCCsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.2.3close SamsungE1100Ccloseclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.3.c.1.101 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.424 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2 SamsungE1100Cmobile:featureyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:01 | by ThaDafinser