User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.1; en-gb; Lenovo A766 Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30 Mobile UCBrowser/3.4.2.525
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 3.4Android 4.2unknown LenovoA766Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 3.4WebKit Android 4.2LenovoA766Mobile Phoneyesyes0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.1LenovoA766mobile-browseryescloseclose0.262 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 3.4WebKit Android 4.2LenovoA766smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 3.4.2closeAndroid 4.2.1LenovoA766closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 3.4.2.525WebKit 534.30Android 4.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.414 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 3.4Webkit 534.30Android 4.2.1LenovoA766mobile:smartyescloseclose0.024 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:00 | by ThaDafinser