User agent detail

MOZILLA/50 (SYMBIANOS/93 U SERIES60/32 SAMSUNG/I8510L/UBHK3 PROFILE/MIDP-21 CONFIGURATION/CLDC-11 ) APPLEWEBKIT/413 (KHTML, LIKE GECKO) SAFARI/413
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungI8510L Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia Browser WebKit SymbianOS NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
APPLEWEBKIT 413closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nokia Web Browser closeSymbian OS mobile-browseryescloseclose0.196 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia OSS Browser 32WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 32SamsungI8510Lsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SamsungI8510Lcloseclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 OSS 32closeSYMBIANOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit 413Symbian closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 413Series60 32SamsungI8510Lmobile:smartyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:00 | by ThaDafinser