User agent detail

ET1 Android Application (16, et1 v2.2.2) - HTC HTC Wildfire S tmo_de - FFFFFFFF-E2A6-9EF0-FFFF-FFFFF1E15B99
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCWildfire S Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
ET1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid HTCWildfire Smobile-browseryescloseclose0.261 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android HTCHTC Wildfiresmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid HTCWildfire Scloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.558 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android HTCWildfire Smobile:smartyescloseclose0.07801 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.042 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:57 | by ThaDafinser