User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; InfoPath.3 UBrowser/1.0.226.1028)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 1.0Windows 7Trident 4.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 8.0Trident 4.0Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.026 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 8.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 8.0closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.194 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident Windows 7desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 8.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 8.0closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 8.0closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.079 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident 4.0Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.381 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 1.0Trident 4.0Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 8.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 8(Compatibility View)closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:57 | by ThaDafinser