User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.3; de-de; Archos 50 Helium 4G Build/JLS36C) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Archos50 Helium 4G Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.06801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.3ArchosHelium 50 4Gmobile-browseryescloseclose0.248 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.3Archos50 Helium 4Gsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.3closeAndroid 4.3Archos50 Helium 4Gcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.106 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.3Archos50 Heliummobile:smartyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 34closeAndroid 4.3ArchosHelium 50 4GSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.06301 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:56 | by ThaDafinser