User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; en-us; FP1 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/9.8.0.435 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-337.php
UC Browser 9.8Android 4.2unknown FairphoneFP1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.8U3 Android 4.2FairphoneFP1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.031 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2FairphoneFP1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.272 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.8WebKit Android 4.2yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.8.0closeAndroid 4.2.2FP1closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.105 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.8.0.435WebKit 533.1Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.579 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.8Webkit 533.1Android 4.2.2FP1mobile:smartyescloseclose0.07701 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:56 | by ThaDafinser