User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Linux; U; Adr 4.1.2; en-US; GT-S5282) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/8.2.0.242 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-3.yml
UC Browser 8.2.0.242Android 4.1.2 SamsungGT-S5282smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.2U2 Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux SamsungGT-S5282mobile-browseryescloseclose0.273 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.2 Android 4.1SamsungGT-S5282smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.2.0closeAndroid 4.1.2SamsungGT-S5282closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.2.0.242 Linux Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.2Gecko Android 4.1.2SamsungGalaxy Starmobile:smartyescloseclose0.028 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.1SamsungGT-S5282Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:56 | by ThaDafinser