User agent detail

HbbTV/1.2.1 (;MTK;MT5396;;;) ANTGalio/3.3.0.26.02.devel
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
ANTGalio 3.3.0.26.02MTK / Nucleus MediaTekMT5396tv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
HbbTV 1.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
ANT Galio 3.3.0.26.02.close media-playercloseclose0.361 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
ANTGalio 3.3 MTK / Nucleus MediaTekMT5396tvyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.2.1close MTKMT5396closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
ANT Galio 3.3.0 MTKMT5396televisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:56 | by ThaDafinser