User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/534 (KHTML, like Gecko) BingPreview/1.0b
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
BingPreview 1.0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesBingPreviewBot/Crawler0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesBing Previewclose0.19 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesBingBotSearch bot0.001 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
BingPreview 1.0closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.102 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
BingPreview 1.0bWebKit 534Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.416 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesBing Previewclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:56 | by ThaDafinser