User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 conkeror/1.0pre
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Conkeror 1.0GNU/Linux Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Conkeror 1.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.245 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Conkeror 1.0Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Conkeror 1.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Conkeror 1.0precloseLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 25.0Gecko 20100101Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.421 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Conkeror 1.0Gecko 25.0Linux desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:55 | by ThaDafinser