User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; x86 Haiku R1; xx) AppleWebKit/537.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) WebPositive/1.2 Safari/537.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-haiku.yaml
WebPositive 1.2Haiku Webkit 537.1desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 537.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 537.1close desktop-browsercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
WebPositive WebKit Haiku OS desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari close closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeHaiku closecloseclosecloseclose0.072 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 537.1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.51 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
WebPositive 1.2Webkit 537.1Haiku desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:55 | by ThaDafinser