User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11;) AppleWebKit/534.34 (KHTML, like Gecko) akregator/4.14.1 Safari/534.34
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
yesakregatorBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesakregatorRSS0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.34closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 534.34close desktop-browsercloseclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Akregator 4.14 0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari close closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.956 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 534.34a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.414 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 534.34 closeclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:55 | by ThaDafinser