User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (MeeGo) AppleWebKit/534.34 (KHTML, like Gecko) Qt/4.7.4 Mobile Safari/534.34
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-317.php
Qt 4.7MeeGo unknownunknown 534.34unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Qt 4.7WebKit MeeGo Mobile Phoneyesyes0.032 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.34closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.182 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit MeeGo yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeMeeGo closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.069 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mobile Safari WebKit 534.34 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Qt 4.7.4Webkit 534.34MeeGo mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:54 | by ThaDafinser