User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/538.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Otter/0.9.04
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-788.php
Otter 0.9Win7 6.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Otter 0.9Blink Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.051 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 538.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Otter 0.9.04closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows 7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Otter 0.9.4closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.195 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 538.1Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.461 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Otter 0.9.04Webkit 538.1Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:54 | by ThaDafinser