User agent detail

Vodafone/1.0/V804SH/SHJ001/SN0000000000000 Browser/UP.Browser/7.0.2.1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Ext-J-Profile/JSCL-1.3.2 Ext-V-Profile/VSCL-2.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/carrier-softbank.yaml
Openwave 7.0 SharpV804SHmobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Vodafone 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.0.2.1close Softbank804SHmobile-browseryescloseclose0.183 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.0 0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 7.0.2close closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.0.2.1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.401 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 7.0 SharpV804SHmobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SoftBank Mobile V804SHcloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close Softbank804SHFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.035 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:54 | by ThaDafinser