User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.4; en-us; AIRIS S211 Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AirisS211 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.4GenericAndroid 4.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.248 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0.4closeAndroid 4.0.4AirisS211closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iris closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.076 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.0.4AirisS211mobile:smartyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.05301 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:54 | by ThaDafinser