User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (MIDP-2.0; U; Adr 4.2.2; en-US; Archos_50_Titanium) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.0.2.389 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Archos50_Titanium Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.0U2 Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close MicromaxBolt A068mobile-browseryescloseclose0.286 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.0 Android 4.2ArchosT329wsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.0.2closeAndroid 4.2.2Archos50_Titaniumcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.056 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.0.2.389 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.0Gecko Android 4.2.2Archos50 Titaniummobile:smartyescloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:53 | by ThaDafinser