User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (BREW; Opera Mini/6.5/34.1016; U; en) Presto/2.8.119 Version/11.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-096.php
Opera Mini 6.5Brew 2.02.2 unknowngeneral Mobile DeviceMobile Deviceyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 6.5Presto 2.2Brew 2.0Mobile Deviceyes0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 6.5close KyoceraE4520mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 6.5Presto Brew yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 6.5close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 6.5closeBREW closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 6.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 6.5Presto 2.8.119 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 6.5Presto 2.8.119Brew mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.10closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 6.0close KyoceraE4520Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:53 | by ThaDafinser