User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.5; NetBSD) KHTML/3.5.10 (like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-bsd.yaml
Konqueror 3.5NetBSD KHTML 3.5.10desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Konqueror 3.5KHTML Desktop0.10801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 3.5closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.181 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 3.5KHTML NetBSD desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Konqueror 3.5;closeNetBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 3.5closeNetBSD closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Konqueror 3.5closeNetBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.067 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 3.5 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.424 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 3.5KHTML 3.5.10NetBSD desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.036 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:53 | by ThaDafinser