User agent detail

Mozilla/4.04 [en] (X11; I; HP-UX B.10.20 9000/712)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-unix.yaml
Netscape Communicator 4.0.4HP-UX 10.20 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Netscape Communicator 4.0.4closeHP-UX 10.20desktop-browsercloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
HP-UX desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 4.04close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 4.4 a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.426 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Netscape Communicator 4.0.4 HP-UX 10.20desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:52 | by ThaDafinser