User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Tizen 2.3; sdk) AppleWebKit/538.1 (KHTML, like Gecko)Version/2.3 Mobile Safari/538.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-tizen.yaml
Tizen 2.3Webkit 538.1emulator Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 2.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 2.3closeLinux mobile-browseryescloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari 2.3WebKit Tizen 2.3yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 2.3closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 2.3closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 2.3closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 538.1Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 538.1Tizen 2.3emulatorcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 2.3closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux TizenFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:52 | by ThaDafinser