User agent detail

NCSA_Mosaic/2.6L10N+ (X11;SunOS 5.6 sun4u) libwww/2.12 modified
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-mosaic.yaml
NCSA Mosaic 2.6Solaris 2.6 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yeslibwwwBot/Crawler0.033 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
NCSA closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NCSA Mosaic 2.6L10NcloseSolaris desktop-browsercloseclose0.192 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NCSA Mosaic 2.6 Solaris 5.6desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeSunOS closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NCSA Mosaic 2.6closeSolaris closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NCSA_Mosaic 2.6L10NcloseSunOS 5.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mosaic 2.6L10N SunOS SunUltraSparccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NCSA Mosaic 2.6 Solaris 2.6desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:51 | by ThaDafinser