User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/42.0.0.10338 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/camouflage.yaml
Chrome Dev 42.0.0.10338Windows 10Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 42.0Blink Win10 10.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 42.0.0.10338closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 42.0.0.10338closeWindows 10.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 42.0Blink Windows 10desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 42.0.0.10338closeWindows 10.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 42.0.0closeWindows 10 closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 42.0.0.10338closeWindows 10 closecloseclosecloseclose0.08 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 42.0.0.10338WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 42.0.0.10338Blink Windows 10desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 42.0.0.10338closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 42.0.0.10338closeWindows 10Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:51 | by ThaDafinser