User agent detail

UCWEB/9.5.1.408 CFNetwork/609 Darwin/13.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 9.5iOS 6.0 mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
CFNetwork WebKit iOS 6.0AppleMobile Deviceyesyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 9.5.1.408closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeMac OS LGC300mobile-browseryescloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.5 iOS 6.0yes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork closeiOS 6.0Applecloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 9.5.1.408closeDarwin closecloseclosecloseclose0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.5.1.408 Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.5 iOS 6.0mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS 6.0AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.05401 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:51 | by ThaDafinser