User agent detail

Samsung-SPHM530 AU-OBIGO/Q04C1-1.22 MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSPHM530 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Samsung-SPHM530 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo Q 4close SamsungSPHM530 AU-OBIGOmobile-browseryescloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SamsungSPHM530smartphoneyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 4.1close SamsungSPHM530closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Q04C1 Browser Q04C1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 4C SamsungSPHM530 AU-OBIGOmobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SamsungSPH-M530Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.027 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:50 | by ThaDafinser