User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows Phone OS 7.0; Trident/3.1; IEMobile/7.0; ; LEO70)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LEO70 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IEMobile 7.0Trident 3.1WinPhone7 7.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE Mobile 7.0closeWindows 7.0GenericWindows Phone 7mobile-browseryescloseclose0.191 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IE Mobile 7.0Trident Windows Phone 7.0yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows Phone closeWindows Phonecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 7.0closeWindows Phone 7.0LEO70closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
IE Mobile 7.0closeWindows Phone OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.067 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer Mobile 7.0Trident 3.1Windows Phone closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 7.0Trident 3.1Windows Phone 7.0mobile:smartyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile 7.0closeWindows Phone 7.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:50 | by ThaDafinser