User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.2; en-ca; GT-I5800D Build/FROYO) AppleWebKit/525.10+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0.4 Mobile Safari/523.12.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-I5800D Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 3.0WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.07501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.0.4closeAndroid 2.2SamsungGT-I5800Dmobile-browseryescloseclose0.284 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.2SamsungGALAXY 3smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.0.4closeAndroid 2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.2closeAndroid 2.2SamsungGT-I5800Dcloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 3.0.4WebKit 525.10Android 2.2Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.429 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 525.10Android 2.2SamsungGalaxy Apollomobile:smartyescloseclose0.03 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.0.4closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.2closeAndroid 2.2SamsungGT-I5800DFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.06201 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:50 | by ThaDafinser