User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.4; de-de; Lenovo A798t Build/IMM76D) UC AppleWebKit/534.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile Safari/534.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LenovoA798t Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.032 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeAndroid 4.0.4LenovoA798tmobile-browseryescloseclose0.265 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0LenovoA798tsmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0.4closeAndroid 4.0.4LenovoA798tcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.122 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 534.31Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.5 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser Webkit 534.31Android 4.0.4LenovoA798mobile:smartyescloseclose0.029 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 4.0closeAndroid 4.0LenovoA798tSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.055 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:48 | by ThaDafinser