User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; Lenovo A526 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/42.0.2311.111 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-732.php
Chrome 42.0Android 4.2unknown LenovoA526Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 42.0Blink Android 4.2LenovoA526Mobile Phoneyesyes0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.111closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 42.0.2311.111closeAndroid 4.2.2LenovoA526mobile-browseryescloseclose0.253 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 42.0Blink Android 4.2LenovoA526smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.111closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 42.0.2311closeAndroid 4.2.2LenovoA526closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.064 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 42.0.2311.111WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 42Blink Android 4.2.2LenovoA526mobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.111closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 44closeAndroid 4.2LenovoA526Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.034 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:48 | by ThaDafinser