User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; webOS/2.2.3; U; de-DE) AppleWebKit/534.6 (KHTML, like Gecko) webOSBrowser/221.54 Safari/534.6 P160UNA/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HPVeer Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
WebKit/webOS WebKit webOS 2.2Mobile Phoneyes0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
wOSBrowser 221.54closewebOS 2.2.3HPP160Umobile-browseryescloseclose0.182 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
wOSBrowser 2.2WebKit webOS 2.2HPVeersmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
webOS Browser 2.2.3closewebOS 2.2.3HPVeercloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeOS/2 closecloseclosecloseclose0.091 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 534.6Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.424 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 534.6webOS 2.2HPVeermobile:smartyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
webOS Browser 2.2closewebOS 2.2HPP160USmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.053 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:47 | by ThaDafinser