User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; Cat Tablet PHOENIX 8.1J0 Build/JRO03C) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/32.0.1700.99 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet.yml
Chrome 32.0.1700.99Android 4.1.1Blink CatPHOENIX 8.1J0tablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 32.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeAndroid 4.1.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.249 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 32.0Blink Android 4.1CatPHOENIX 8.1J0tabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 32.0.1700closeAndroid 4.1.1CatTablet PHOENIX 8.1J0closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Phoenix 8.1J0 BuildcloseAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.081 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Phoenix WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 32Blink Android 4.1.1CATPHOENIXtabletyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:47 | by ThaDafinser