User agent detail

Nokia7230-1co5.0 (10.81) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDCm1.1 Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/420+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/420k
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia7230-1co5 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 420kcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 420kclose desktop-browsercloseclose0.199 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser WebKit Symbian Nokia7230-1co5smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser MIDcloseNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close Nokia7230-1co5closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 420NokiaOS NokiaNokia 7230-1co5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.416 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 420Series40 Nokia7230mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo Q05Aclose Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:47 | by ThaDafinser