User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (;;;) AppleWebKit/534.6 HbbTV/1.1.1 (+DL+PVR; inverto; IDL-6640N Volksbox Essential; 1.0; 1.0;) hdplusinteraktiv/1.0 (NETRANGEMMH;) CE-HTML/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
InvertoIDL-6640N Volksbox Essentialtv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake BrowserBot/Crawler0.17102 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close media-playercloseclose0.207 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
InvertoIDL-6640N Volksbox Essentialtv0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1close invertoIDL-6640N Volksbox Essentialcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 534.6 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.438 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 534.6 InvertoIDL 6640N Volksbox Essentialtelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:46 | by ThaDafinser