User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini; U; xx) Presto/2.12.423 Version/11.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-opera.yaml
Opera Mini Presto 2.12.423mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini Presto 2.2JAVA Mobile Deviceyes0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 11.10closeJVM desktop-browsercloseclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 11.10Presto 0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 2.12.423close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 11.10close closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini close closecloseclosecloseclose0.095 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini Presto 2.12.423 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini Presto 2.12.423 mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.10closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari closeiOS OperaMini 1Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:45 | by ThaDafinser