User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; S6000D Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/42.0.2311.38 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Chrome 42.0Android 4.4unknown LenovoS6000DTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 42.0Blink Android 4.4LenovoS6000DTabletyesyes0.036 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.38closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 42.0.2311.38closeAndroid 4.4.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.284 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 42.0Blink Android 4.4tabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.38closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 42.0.2311closeAndroid 4.4.2S6000Dcloseclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.089 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 42.0.2311.38WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.417 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 42Blink Android 4.4.2S6000Dtabletyescloseclose0.09101 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.38closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Tabletyesyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:44 | by ThaDafinser