User agent detail

MOT-A-3E/00.02 UP.Browser/7.0.2.2.c.1.108 (GUI) MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaA-3E Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.0 Mobile Phoneyes0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-A-3E 00.02closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.0.2.2.c.1.108close Motorolai760mobile-browseryescloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.0 MotorolaAsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 7.0.2close MotorolaA-3Ecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.0.2.2.c.1.108 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.509 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 7.0 MotorolaA-3Emobile:featureyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Motorolai760Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.038 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:44 | by ThaDafinser