User agent detail

MOZILLA41 (COMPATIBLE MSIE 50 SYMBIAN OS NOKIA 3650452) OPERA 620 EN
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia3650452 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 620closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 620closeSymbian OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 620Blink Symbian OS Nokia3650452smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 620closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close Nokia3650452closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 620closeSYMBIAN OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 620 Symbian Nokiacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 50 Nokia3650452mobile:featureyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:44 | by ThaDafinser