User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; CrOS x86_64 2913.193.0) AppleWebKit/537.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/23.0.1271.91 Safari/537.11
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-chromeos.yaml
Chrome 23Chrome OS Webkit 537.11desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome Blink ChromeOS Linux DesktopDesktop0.031 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 23.0.1271.91closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 23.0.1271.91closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.181 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 23.0WebKit Chrome OS 2913.193desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 23.0.1271.91closeChrome OS 23.0.1271.91closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 23.0.1271closeChrome OS 2913.193.0closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 23.0.1271.91closeChrome OS 2913.193.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 23.0.1271.91WebKit 537.11ChromeOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 23Webkit 537.11Chrome OS desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 23.0.1271.91closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 23.0.1271.64closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:43 | by ThaDafinser