User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.1; zh-cn; HUAWEI_G510-0200 Build/HuaweiG510-0200; 480*854) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1/UCWEB7.9.0.94/139/355
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HuaweiG510-0200 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 3.1WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.15501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.1.2closeAndroid 4.1.1GenericAndroid 2.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.253 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.9WebKit Android 4.1HuaweiG510-0200smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.9.0closeAndroid 4.1.1HuaweiG510-0200closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 7.9.0.94closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.9.0.94WebKit 528.5Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.9Webkit 528.5Android 4.1.1HuaweiAscend G510mobile:smartyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:43 | by ThaDafinser