User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Vodafone/1.0/LG-KM900/V10l Browser/Obigo-Q7.1 MMS/LG-MMS-V1.0/1.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGKM900 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 7.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.036 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo Q 7.1close LGKM900mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo LGKM900smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 7.1close LGKM900closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Browser LGLGKM900closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 7.1 LGKM900mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SoftBank Mobile LG-KM900closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo Q05Aclose Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:43 | by ThaDafinser